Components of a Chilkat Secret Name

The key idea is that the components of a secret name are just a structured naming convention—not enforced semantics.


They’re Labels, Not Rules

The fields:

  • appName
  • service
  • domain
  • username

are not interpreted by Chilkat as having fixed meaning. They are simply named parts used to construct a unique identifier.

Chilkat does not “understand” what a service or username is — it just uses these parts to build and locate a secret.


You Define the Meaning

You are free to assign meaning however you want. For example:

Traditional usage

{
  "appName": "MyApp",
  "service": "OAuth2",
  "domain": "office365.com",
  "username": "joe@example.com"
}

Completely custom meaning

{
  "appName": "Prod",
  "service": "Database",
  "domain": "ClusterA",
  "username": "ReadOnlyUser"
}

Another example (API keys)

{
  "service": "Stripe",
  "username": "SecretKey"
}

In each case, the components mean whatever your application decides they mean.


Why This Flexibility Exists

Different systems have different constraints:

  • Some require a single string name
  • Some separate fields like service/account
  • Some restrict allowed characters

Chilkat’s model:

  • Gives you a consistent structure
  • Lets you define your own semantics
  • Handles the translation to each backend automatically

Think of It Like a Path

A secret name is essentially a hierarchical key, similar to:

environment / category / subcategory / identifier

You might interpret it as:

  • appName → environment (Dev/Prod)
  • service → system or feature
  • domain → region or tenant
  • username → specific key or identity

But that’s your design choice, not a requirement.


️ What Actually Matters

The only real constraints are:

  • service and username must be present
  • The combination must uniquely identify the secret
  • Your application should be consistent in how it uses them

Bottom Line

These components are just a structured way to name secrets. Their meaning is entirely up to you.

Chilkat provides the structure and portability — you provide the semantics.